Inside the Woke Indoctrination
Machine
After watching 100
hours of leaked video, we now fully grasp the danger of this ideology in
schools.
By Andrew Gutmann
and Paul Rossi
Wall Street
Journal, Feb. 11, 2022
Last spring we exposed how two elite independent schools in
New York had become corrupted by a divisive obsession with race, helping start
the national movement against critical race theory. Schools apply this theory
under the guise of diversity, equity and inclusion programming. Until now,
however, neither of us fully grasped the dangers of this ideology or the true
motives of its practitioners. The goal of DEI isn’t only to teach students
about slavery or encourage courageous conversations about race, it is to
transform schools totally and reshape society radically.
Over the past month we have watched nearly 100 hours of
leaked videos from 108 workshops held virtually last year for the National
Association of Independent Schools’ People of Color Conference. The NAIS sets
standards for more than 1,600 independent schools in the U.S., driving their
missions and influencing many school policies. The conference is NAIS’s
flagship annual event for disseminating DEI practices, and more than 6,000 DEI
practitioners, educators and administrators attended this year. Intended as
professional development and not meant for the public, these workshops are
honest, transparent and unfiltered—very different from how private schools
typically communicate DEI initiatives. These leaked videos act as a Rosetta
Stone for deciphering the DEI playbook.
The path to remake schools begins with the word “diversity,”
which means much more than simply increasing the number of students and faculty
of color—referred to in these workshops as “Bipoc,”
which stands for “black, indigenous and people of color.” DEI experts urge
schools to classify people by identities such as race, convince them that they
are being harmed by their environment, and turn them into fervent advocates for
institutional change.
In workshops such as “Integrating Healing-Centered
Engagements Into a DEIA School Program” and “Racial Trauma and the Path Toward
Healing,” we learned how DEI practitioners use segregated affinity groups and
practices such as healing circles to inculcate feelings of trauma. Even
students without grievances are trained to see themselves as victims of the
their ancestors’ suffering through “intergenerational violence.”
The next step in a school’s transformation is “inclusion.”
Schools must integrate DEI work into every aspect of the school and every facet
of the curriculum must be evaluated through an antibias, antiracist, or antioppressive lens. In “Let’s Talk About It!
Anti-Oppressive Unit and Lesson Plan Design,” we learned that the omission of
this lens—“failing to explore the intersection of STEM and social justice,” for
instance—constitutes an act of “curriculum violence.”
All school messaging must be scrubbed of noninclusive
language, all school policies of noninclusive
practices, all libraries of noninclusive books.
Inclusion also requires that all non-Bipoc
stakeholders become allies in the fight against the systemic harm being perpetuated
by the institution. In “Small Activists, Big Impact—Cultivating Anti-Racists
and Activists in Kindergarten,” we were told that “kindergartners are natural
social-justice warriors.”
It isn’t enough for a school to be inclusive; it also must
foster “belonging.” Belonging means that a school must be a “safe space”—code
for prohibiting any speech or activity, regardless of intent, that a Bipoc student or faculty member might perceive as harmful,
as uncomfortable or as questioning their “lived experience.” The primary tool
for suppressing speech is to create a fear of microaggressions.
In “Feeding Yourself When You Are Fed Up: Connecting
Resilience and DEI Work,” we learned techniques, such as “calling out,” that
faculty and students can use to shut down conversations immediately by
interrupting speakers and letting them know that their words and actions are
unacceptable and won’t be tolerated. Several workshops focused on the practice
of “restorative justice,” used to re-educate students who fall afoul of speech
codes. The final step to ensure belonging is to push out families or faculty
who question DEI work. “Sometimes you gotta say,
maybe this is not the right school for you. . . . I’ve said that a lot this
year,” said Victor Shin, an assistant head of school and co-chairman of the
People of Color Conference, in “From Pawns to Controlling the Board: Seeing
BIPOC Students as Power Players in Student Programming.”
With the implementation of diversity, inclusion and
belonging, schools can begin to address the primary objectives of DEI work:
equity and justice. NAIS obligates all member schools to commit to these aims
in their mission statements or defining documents. Equity requires dismantling
all systems that Bipoc members of the community
believe to cause harm. Justice is the final stage of social transformation to
“collective liberation.” The goal is to remake society into a collective,
stripped of individualism and rife with reparations.
In sessions such as “Traversing the Long and Thorny Road
Toward Equity in Our Schools,” “Moving the Needle Toward Meaningful
Institutional Change,” “Building an Equitable and Liberating Mindset” and
“Breaking the White Centered Cycle,” we learned that the only way to achieve
equity and justice is to eradicate all aspects of white-supremacy culture from
“predominantly white institutions,” or PWIs, as NAIS calls its member schools,
irrespective of the diversity of a school’s students. Perfectionism,
punctuality, urgency, niceness, worship of the written word, progress, objectivity,
rigor, individualism, capitalism and liberalism are some of the characteristics
of white-supremacy culture in need of elimination. In “Post-PoCC
Return to PWI Normal,” DEI practitioner Maria Graciela Alcid
summarized: “Decolonizing white-supremacy-culture thinking is the ongoing act
of deconstructing, dismantling, disrupting those colonial ideologies and the
superiority of Western thought.”
DEI was “another thing to put on the plate, and absolutely
now, it is the plate on which everything sits” said teacher Gina Favre,
describing her school’s transformation.
No longer are private schools focused primarily on teaching
critical thinking, fostering intellectual curiosity, and rewarding independent
thought. Their new mission is to train a vanguard of activists to lead the
charge in tearing down the foundations of society, reminiscent of Maoist
China’s Red Guards.
The danger, however, goes far beyond private schools. The
same framework called diversity, inclusion, belonging, equity and justice has
gained influence in public education, universities, corporate workplaces, the
federal government and the military. For the sake of our children and our nation’s
future, it must be dismantled.
Mr. Gutmann is founder of Speak Up for Education and a
co-host of the podcast “Take Back Our Schools.” Mr. Rossi is a contributor to
Legal Insurrection and co-host of Chalkboard Heresy, a channel for dissidents
in education.
·
WSJ Opinion: Sports and The Stand Against
Political Correctness
·
Play video: WSJ Opinion: Sports and The Stand
Against Political Correctness
·
Wonder Land: With athletes pushing back against
woke agendas in basketball, swimming and football, the PC project may be
running out of steam. Images: AP/AFP/Getty Images Composite: Mark Kelly
Appeared in the February 12, 2022, print edition.